The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Far Are We From Data-Driven and Animal-Based Welfare Assessment? A Critical Analysis of European Quality Schemes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Animal Science, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fanim.2022.874260 |
| Authors |
Anna H. Stygar, Caspar Krampe, Pol Llonch, Jarkko K. Niemi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3 | 20% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| Slovakia | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 31% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,500,568
of 26,038,372 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Animal Science
#26
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,178
of 450,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Animal Science
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,038,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.