↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of non-penetrative captive bolt stunning as a method of slaughter for white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Animal Science, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of non-penetrative captive bolt stunning as a method of slaughter for white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus)
Published in
Frontiers in Animal Science, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fanim.2024.1405554
Authors

Jackson A. Gross, Jennifer R. Bowman, Denise M. Imai, Talia S. Wong, Toni L. Duarte, Sara E. Boles, Robert J. McGorrin, Xiang Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2024.
All research outputs
#21,219,867
of 26,058,621 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Animal Science
#210
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,289
of 143,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Animal Science
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,058,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.