↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of outcomes in a clinical trial: comparing self-fit hearing aids and hearing aids fit with best practices

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Audiology and Otology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of outcomes in a clinical trial: comparing self-fit hearing aids and hearing aids fit with best practices
Published in
Frontiers in Audiology and Otology, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fauot.2024.1397604
Authors

Anusha Yellamsetty, Rebecca M. Lewis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,551,906
of 26,455,955 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Audiology and Otology
#14
of 21 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,895
of 242,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Audiology and Otology
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,455,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.