↓ Skip to main content

Would a comprehensive hearing aid fitting process lead to placebo effects compared to a simple process?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Audiology and Otology, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Would a comprehensive hearing aid fitting process lead to placebo effects compared to a simple process?
Published in
Frontiers in Audiology and Otology, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fauot.2024.1411397
Authors

Yu-Hsiang Wu, Megan Dorfler, Elizabeth Stangl, Jacob Oleson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#21,256,848
of 26,102,714 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Audiology and Otology
#10
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,244
of 160,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Audiology and Otology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,102,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.4. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.