↓ Skip to main content

Why Most Traumatic Brain Injuries are Not Caused by Linear Acceleration but Skull Fractures are

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 7,986)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
47 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why Most Traumatic Brain Injuries are Not Caused by Linear Acceleration but Skull Fractures are
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2013.00015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Svein Kleiven

Abstract

Injury statistics have found the most common accident situation to be an oblique impact. An oblique impact will give rise to both linear and rotational head kinematics. The human brain is most sensitive to rotational motion. The bulk modulus of brain tissue is roughly five to six orders of magnitude larger than the shear modulus so that for a given impact it tends to deform predominantly in shear. This gives a large sensitivity of the strain in the brain to rotational loading and a small sensitivity to linear kinematics. Therefore, rotational kinematics should be a better indicator of traumatic brain injury risk than linear acceleration. To illustrate the difference between radial and oblique impacts, perpendicular impacts through the center of gravity of the head and 45° oblique impacts were simulated. It is obvious that substantially higher strain levels in the brain are obtained for an oblique impact, compared to a corresponding perpendicular one, when impacted into the same padding using an identical impact velocity. It was also clearly illustrated that the radial impact causes substantially higher stresses in the skull with an associated higher risk of skull fractures, and traumatic brain injuries secondary to those.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 281 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 18%
Student > Master 40 14%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 83 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 92 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 7%
Neuroscience 17 6%
Sports and Recreations 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 100 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 362. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#83,924
of 24,657,405 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#9
of 7,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#466
of 291,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,657,405 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,986 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.