↓ Skip to main content

Applications of Magnetosomes Synthesized by Magnetotactic Bacteria in Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applications of Magnetosomes Synthesized by Magnetotactic Bacteria in Medicine
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edouard Alphandéry

Abstract

Magnetotactic bacteria belong to a group of bacteria that synthesize iron oxide nanoparticles covered by biological material that are called magnetosomes. These bacteria use the magnetosomes as a compass to navigate in the direction of the earth's magnetic field. This compass helps the bacteria to find the optimum conditions for their growth and survival. Here, we review several medical applications of magnetosomes, such as those in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic hyperthermia, and drug delivery. Different methods that can be used to prepare the magnetosomes for these applications are described. The toxicity and biodistribution results that have been published are summarized. They show that the magnetosomes can safely be used provided that they are prepared in specific conditions. The advantageous properties of the magnetosomes compared with those of chemically synthesized nanoparticles of similar composition are also highlighted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 230 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 18%
Student > Bachelor 39 17%
Student > Master 37 16%
Researcher 27 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 4%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 50 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 14%
Chemistry 19 8%
Engineering 17 7%
Physics and Astronomy 15 6%
Other 52 22%
Unknown 60 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,383,305
of 25,008,338 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#290
of 8,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,209
of 226,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,008,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.