The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recent Advances in Carbon Nanotube-Based Enzymatic Fuel Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00045 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Serge Cosnier, Michael Holzinger, Alan Le Goff |
| Abstract |
This review summarizes recent trends in the field of enzymatic fuel cells. Thanks to the high specificity of enzymes, biofuel cells can generate electrical energy by oxidation of a targeted fuel (sugars, alcohols, or hydrogen) at the anode and reduction of oxidants (O2, H2O2) at the cathode in complex media. The combination of carbon nanotubes (CNT), enzymes and redox mediators was widely exploited to develop biofuel cells since the electrons involved in the bio-electrocatalytic processes can be efficiently transferred from or to an external circuit. Original approaches to construct electron transfer based CNT-bioelectrodes and impressive biofuel cell performances are reported as well as biomedical applications. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 25% |
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 23 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#4,052
of 8,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,887
of 274,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.