↓ Skip to main content

Design and Construction of a Whole Cell Bacterial 4-Hydroxyphenylacetic Acid and 2-Phenylacetic Acid Bioassay

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design and Construction of a Whole Cell Bacterial 4-Hydroxyphenylacetic Acid and 2-Phenylacetic Acid Bioassay
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seppe Dierckx, Sandra Van Puyvelde, Lyn Venken, Wolfgang Eberle, Jos Vanderleyden

Abstract

Auxins are hormones that regulate plant growth and development. To accurately quantify the low levels of auxins present in plant and soil samples, sensitive detection methods are needed. In this study, the design and construction of two different whole cell auxin bioassays is illustrated. Both use the auxin responsive element HpaA as an input module but differ in output module. The first bioassay incorporates the gfp gene to produce a fluorescent bioassay. Whereas the second one utilizes the genes phzM and phzS to produce a pyocyanin producing bioassay whose product can be measured electrochemically. The fluorescent bioassay is able to detect 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (4-HPA) and 2-phenylacetic acid (PAA) concentrations from 60 μM to 3 mM in a dose-responsive manner. The pyocyanin producing bioassay can detect 4-HPA concentrations from 1.9 to 15.625 μM and PAA concentrations from 15.625 to 125 μM, both in a dose-responsive manner. A fluorescent whole cell auxin bioassay and an electrochemical whole cell auxin bioassay were constructed and tested. Both are able to detect 4-HPA and PAA at concentrations that are environmentally relevant to plant growth.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 20%
Chemistry 4 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#4,051
of 8,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,852
of 264,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#30
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.