The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Commentary: Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Denes, Guislaine Barrière, Evelyne Poli, Guillaume Lévêque |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 126 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 11 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 129 | 73% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#17,881,664
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,912
of 6,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,357
of 308,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,685 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.