↓ Skip to main content

Granular Carbon-Based Electrodes as Cathodes in Methane-Producing Bioelectrochemical Systems

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Granular Carbon-Based Electrodes as Cathodes in Methane-Producing Bioelectrochemical Systems
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00078
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dandan Liu, Marta Roca-Puigros, Florian Geppert, Leire Caizán-Juanarena, Susakul P. Na Ayudthaya, Cees Buisman, Annemiek ter Heijne

Abstract

Methane-producing bioelectrochemical systems generate methane by using microorganisms to reduce carbon dioxide at the cathode with external electricity supply. This technology provides an innovative approach for renewable electricity conversion and storage. Two key factors that need further attention are production of methane at high rate, and stable performance under intermittent electricity supply. To study these key factors, we have used two electrode materials: granular activated carbon (GAC) and graphite granules (GG). Under galvanostatic control, the biocathodes achieved methane production rates of around 65 L CH4/m2catproj/d at 35 A/m2catproj, which is 3.8 times higher than reported so far. We also operated all biocathodes with intermittent current supply (time-ON/time-OFF: 4-2', 3-3', 2-4'). Current-to-methane efficiencies of all biocathodes were stable around 60% at 10 A/m2catproj and slightly decreased with increasing OFF time at 35 A/m2catproj, but original performance of all biocathodes was recovered soon after intermittent operation. Interestingly, the GAC biocathodes had a lower overpotential than the GG biocathodes, with methane generation occurring at -0.52 V vs. Ag/AgCl for GAC and at -0.92 V for GG at a current density of 10 A/m2catproj. 16S rRNA gene analysis showed that Methanobacterium was the dominant methanogen and that the GAC biocathodes experienced a higher abundance of proteobacteria than the GG biocathodes. Both cathode materials show promise for the practical application of methane-producing BESs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 30%
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 21%
Engineering 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Chemistry 7 6%
Chemical Engineering 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 42 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,392,566
of 26,146,017 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#786
of 8,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,929
of 344,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#19
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,146,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,688 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.