↓ Skip to main content

Novel Features and Considerations for ERA and Regulation of Crops Produced by Genome Editing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
37 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel Features and Considerations for ERA and Regulation of Crops Produced by Genome Editing
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina Duensing, Thorben Sprink, Wayne A. Parrott, Maria Fedorova, Martin A. Lema, Jeffrey D. Wolt, Detlef Bartsch

Abstract

Genome editing describes a variety of molecular biology applications enabling targeted and precise alterations of the genomes of plants, animals and microorganisms. These rapidly developing techniques are likely to revolutionize the breeding of new crop varieties. Since genome editing can lead to the development of plants that could also have come into existence naturally or by conventional breeding techniques, there are strong arguments that these cases should not be classified as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and be regulated no differently from conventionally bred crops. If a specific regulation would be regarded necessary, the application of genome editing for crop development may challenge risk assessment and post-market monitoring. In the session "Plant genome editing-any novel features to consider for ERA and regulation?" held at the 14th ISBGMO, scientists from various disciplines as well as regulators, risk assessors and potential users of the new technologies were brought together for a knowledge-based discussion to identify knowledge gaps and analyze scenarios for the introduction of genome-edited crops into the environment. It was aimed to enable an open exchange forum on the regulatory approaches, ethical aspects and decision-making considerations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 17%
Engineering 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,075,137
of 26,194,269 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#91
of 8,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,320
of 344,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,194,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,695 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.