↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing a Human Papillomavirus Type 16 L1-Based Chimaeric Gene for Expression in Plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimizing a Human Papillomavirus Type 16 L1-Based Chimaeric Gene for Expression in Plants
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inga I. Hitzeroth, Aleyo Chabeda, Mark P. Whitehead, Marcus Graf, Edward P. Rybicki

Abstract

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the causative agents of cervical cancer, the fourth most prevalent cancer in women worldwide. The major capsid protein L1 self-assembles into virus-like particles (VLPs), even in the absence of the minor L2 protein: such VLPs have successfully been used as prophylactic vaccines. There remains a need, however, to develop cheaper vaccines that protect against a wider range of HPV types. The use of all or parts of the L2 minor capsid protein can potentially address this issue, as it has sequence regions conserved across several HPV types, which can elicit a wider spectrum of cross-neutralizing antibodies. Production of HPV VLPs in plants is a viable option to reduce costs; the use of a L1/L2 chimera which has previously elicited a cross-protective immune response is an option to broaden cross-protection. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of codon optimization and of increasing the G+C content of synthetic L1/L2 genes on protein expression in plants. Additionally, we replaced varying portions of the 5' region of the L1 gene with the wild type (wt) viral sequence to determine the effect of several negative regulatory elements on expression. We showed that GC-rich genes resulted in a 10-fold increase of mRNA levels and 3-fold higher accumulation of proteins. However, the highest increase of expression was achieved with a high GC-content human codon-optimized gene, which resulted in a 100-fold increase in mRNA levels and 8- to 9-fold increase in protein levels. Changing the 5' end of the L1 gene back to its wt sequence decreased mRNA and protein expression. Our results suggest that the negative elements in the 5' end of L1 are inadvertently destroyed by changing the codon usage, which enhances protein expression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 13 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,930,202
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,786
of 6,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,978
of 326,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#26
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,779 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.