↓ Skip to main content

The Less the Better: How Suppressed Base Addition Boosts Production of Monoclonal Antibodies With Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Less the Better: How Suppressed Base Addition Boosts Production of Monoclonal Antibodies With Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max Becker, Lisa Junghans, Attila Teleki, Jan Bechmann, Ralf Takors

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 31 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 20%
Chemical Engineering 8 10%
Engineering 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 33 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#20,564,621
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#4,691
of 6,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,130
of 353,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#68
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,826 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.