The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Perspectives on Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) and the Cyberbiosecurity of Freshwater Systems
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00128 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David G. Schmale, Andrew P. Ault, Walid Saad, Durelle T. Scott, Judy A. Westrick |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 20% |
Australia | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
Researcher | 9 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 16% |
Unknown | 56 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 12 | 8% |
Engineering | 12 | 8% |
Computer Science | 9 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 14% |
Unknown | 68 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,727,814
of 23,322,966 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#700
of 6,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,881
of 353,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#17
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,965 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.