The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effectiveness of Wearable Upper Limb Assistive Devices in Degenerative Neuromuscular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00450 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta Gandolla, Alberto Antonietti, Valeria Longatelli, Alessandra Pedrocchi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Librarian | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 17 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2022.
All research outputs
#12,947,444
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,412
of 6,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,739
of 449,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#85
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.