↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Three Xylose Pathways in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 for the Synthesis of Valuable Products

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Three Xylose Pathways in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 for the Synthesis of Valuable Products
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, January 2020
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabel Bator, Andreas Wittgens, Frank Rosenau, Till Tiso, Lars M. Blank

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 33 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Chemical Engineering 7 6%
Chemistry 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 39 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,842,202
of 26,379,745 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,113
of 8,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,934
of 483,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#115
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,379,745 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,743 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.