The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of Computational Modeling to Study Joint Degeneration: A Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00093 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Satanik Mukherjee, Majid Nazemi, Ilse Jonkers, Liesbet Geris |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 5 | 24% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 14 | 67% |
Members of the public | 7 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
Researcher | 11 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 44 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 31 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 12% |
Unknown | 43 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,035,111
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#231
of 6,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,841
of 359,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#26
of 313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.