The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hand Control With Invasive Feedback Is Not Impaired by Increased Cognitive Load
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00287 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giacomo Valle, Edoardo D’Anna, Ivo Strauss, Francesco Clemente, Giuseppe Granata, Riccardo Di Iorio, Marco Controzzi, Thomas Stieglitz, Paolo M. Rossini, Francesco M. Petrini, Silvestro Micera |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 25% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 31 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,117,178
of 24,155,398 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#419
of 7,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,601
of 375,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#26
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,155,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.