The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Temporal Asynchrony but Not Total Energy Nor Duration Improves the Judgment of Numerosity in Electrotactile Stimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00555 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Nataletti, Fabrizio Leo, Lucia Seminara, Carlo Trompetto, Maurizio Valle, Strahinja Dosen, Luca Brayda |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 7 | 21% |
| Engineering | 6 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2020.
All research outputs
#13,445,392
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,562
of 6,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,929
of 399,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#160
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,892 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.