The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Energy Expenditure of Dynamic Submaximal Human Plantarflexion Movements: Model Prediction and Validation by in-vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00622 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel F. B. Haeufle, Johannes Siegel, Stefan Hochstein, Alexander Gussew, Syn Schmitt, Tobias Siebert, Reinhard Rzanny, Jürgen R. Reichenbach, Norman Stutzig |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 24% |
Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
Engineering | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#18,730,833
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,499
of 6,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,407
of 399,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#268
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,893 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.