You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differences in Muscle Synergy Symmetry Between Subacute Post-stroke Patients With Bioelectrically-Controlled Exoskeleton Gait Training and Conventional Gait Training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00770 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chun Kwang Tan, Hideki Kadone, Hiroki Watanabe, Aiki Marushima, Yasushi Hada, Masashi Yamazaki, Yoshiyuki Sankai, Akira Matsumura, Kenji Suzuki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#18,072,774
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,979
of 6,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,141
of 399,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#211
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,900 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.