The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Few Who Made It: Commercially and Clinically Successful Innovative Bone Grafts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00952 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ignacio Sallent, Héctor Capella-Monsonís, Philip Procter, Ilia Y. Bozo, Roman V. Deev, Dimitri Zubov, Roman Vasyliev, Giuseppe Perale, Gianni Pertici, Justin Baker, Peter Gingras, Yves Bayon, Dimitrios I. Zeugolis |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 15% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,822,595
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#522
of 6,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,829
of 400,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#49
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,965 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.