The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human Salivary Histatin-1 Is More Efficacious in Promoting Acute Skin Wound Healing Than Acellular Dermal Matrix Paste
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00999 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoxuan Lei, Liuhanghang Cheng, Haiyan Lin, Mengru Pang, Zexin Yao, Caihong Chen, Tymour Forouzanfar, Floris J. Bikker, Gang Wu, Biao Cheng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#20,637,315
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#4,729
of 6,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,891
of 400,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#270
of 402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,907 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.