You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation and Optimization of Protein Extraction From E. coli by Electroporation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.543187 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saša Haberl Meglič, Nika Janež, Matjaž Peterka, Karel Flisar, Tadej Kotnik, Damijan Miklavčič |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 19% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#18,745,728
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,506
of 6,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,990
of 400,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#204
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,907 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.