The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Muscle Activation Patterns Are More Constrained and Regular in Treadmill Than in Overground Human Locomotion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.581619 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilaria Mileti, Aurora Serra, Nerses Wolf, Victor Munoz-Martel, Antonis Ekizos, Eduardo Palermo, Adamantios Arampatzis, Alessandro Santuz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 18% |
| Engineering | 7 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,272,917
of 26,176,714 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,113
of 8,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,067
of 444,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#80
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,176,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,692 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.