The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Social Integrating Robots Suggest Mitigation Strategies for Ecosystem Decay
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2021.612605 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Schmickl, Martina Szopek, Francesco Mondada, Rob Mills, Martin Stefanec, Daniel N. Hofstadler, Dajana Lazic, Rafael Barmak, Frank Bonnet, Payam Zahadat |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 17% |
Belgium | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
Engineering | 2 | 9% |
Psychology | 2 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,363,381
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,202
of 7,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,492
of 448,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#57
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.