The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence-Based Network Modelling to Simulate Nucleus Pulposus Multicellular Activity in Different Nutritional and Pro-Inflammatory Environments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2021.734258 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Baumgartner, A. Sadowska, L. Tío, M. A. González Ballester, K. Wuertz-Kozak, J. Noailly |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Czechia | 1 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,050,331
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#74
of 6,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,481
of 433,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,524 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.