The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A critical review on polydopamine surface-modified scaffolds in musculoskeletal regeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1008360 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hamidreza Tolabi, Negar Bakhtiary, Shaghayegh Sayadi, Maryam Tamaddon, Farnaz Ghorbani, Aldo R. Boccaccini, Chaozong Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 5 | 17% |
| Engineering | 3 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,614,827
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,220
of 8,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,343
of 487,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#44
of 551 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,314 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 551 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.