The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Ultra-small molybdenum-based nanodots as an antioxidant platform for effective treatment of periodontal disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1066160 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li Chen, Tianjiao Zhao, Min Liu, Qiaohui Chen, Yunrong Yang, Jinping Zhang, Shuya Wang, Xiaoyu Zhu, Huanan Zhang, Qiong Huang, Kelong Ai |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#20,493,046
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#4,657
of 6,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#352,100
of 443,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#397
of 691 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 691 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.