The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-Associated Proteins13a combined with magnetic beads, chemiluminescence and reverse transcription-recombinase aided amplification for detection of avian influenza a (H7N9) virus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1094028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hongpan Xu, Lijun Peng, Jie Wu, Adeel Khan, Yifan Sun, Han Shen, Zhiyang Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#14,350,902
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,623
of 8,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,619
of 476,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#52
of 535 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,399 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 535 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.