↓ Skip to main content

Electronic Bone Growth Stimulators for Augmentation of Osteogenesis in In Vitro and In Vivo Models: A Narrative Review of Electrical Stimulation Mechanisms and Device Specifications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electronic Bone Growth Stimulators for Augmentation of Osteogenesis in In Vitro and In Vivo Models: A Narrative Review of Electrical Stimulation Mechanisms and Device Specifications
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2022.793945
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J. Nicksic, D’Andrea T. Donnelly, Madison Hesse, Simran Bedi, Nishant Verma, Allison J. Seitz, Andrew J. Shoffstall, Kip A. Ludwig, Aaron M. Dingle, Samuel O. Poore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 15 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 18 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,376,550
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,606
of 6,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,735
of 513,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#111
of 627 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 627 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.