The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Spatial Assessment of Heterogeneous Tissue Natural Frequency Using Micro-Force Optical Coherence Elastography
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2022.851094 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gongpu Lan, Qun Shi, Yicheng Wang, Guoqin Ma, Jing Cai, Jinping Feng, Yanping Huang, Boyu Gu, Lin An, Jingjiang Xu, Jia Qin, Michael D. Twa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2022.
All research outputs
#18,819,867
of 23,322,966 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,531
of 6,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317,272
of 440,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#277
of 634 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,965 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 634 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.