↓ Skip to main content

CRISPR/Cas- and Topical RNAi-Based Technologies for Crop Management and Improvement: Reviewing the Risk Assessment and Challenges Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CRISPR/Cas- and Topical RNAi-Based Technologies for Crop Management and Improvement: Reviewing the Risk Assessment and Challenges Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2022.913728
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabiano Touzdjian Pinheiro Kohlrausch Távora, Francisco de Assis dos Santos Diniz, Camila de Moraes Rêgo-Machado, Natália Chagas Freitas, Fabrício Barbosa Monteiro Arraes, Eduardo Chumbinho de Andrade, Leila Lourenço Furtado, Karen Ofuji Osiro, Natália Lima de Sousa, Thiago Bérgamo Cardoso, Liliane Márcia Mertz Henning, Patrícia Abrão de Oliveira Molinari, Sérgio Enrique Feingold, Wayne B. Hunter, Maria Fátima Grossi de Sá, Adilson Kenji Kobayashi, Alexandre Lima Nepomuceno, Thaís Ribeiro Santiago, Hugo Bruno Correa Molinari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Lecturer 4 7%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 19%
Unspecified 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,552,541
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,680
of 6,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,166
of 438,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#90
of 598 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,687 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 598 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.