↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: 3D-printed biomaterials in osteochondral repair

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: 3D-printed biomaterials in osteochondral repair
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2022.983945
Pubmed ID
Authors

Changchun Zhou, Lan Li, Xiaofeng Jia, Lei Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#17,998,207
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,948
of 6,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,648
of 403,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#219
of 706 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 706 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.