The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characteristics of enzymolysis of silkworm pupa protein after tri-frequency ultrasonic pretreatment: kinetics, thermodynamics, structure and antioxidant changes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1170676 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuangmei Ge, Chunyan He, Yichen Duan, Xiaotao Zhou, Jialong Lei, Xiangyun Tong, Libing Wang, Qiongying Wu, Junqiang Jia |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,326,192
of 26,176,298 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#4,206
of 8,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,493
of 386,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#147
of 434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,176,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,692 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.