The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An image cryptography method by highly error-prone DNA storage channel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1173763 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiangzhen Zan, Ling Chu, Ranze Xie, Yanqing Su, Xiangyu Yao, Peng Xu, Wenbin Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#15,985,376
of 23,726,221 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,781
of 7,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,335
of 281,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#50
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,726,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,261 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.