The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: A minimally manipulated preservation and virus inactivation method for amnion/chorion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1210771 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shang Zhang, Lichang Gao, Pin Wang, Yuyan Ma, Xiaoliang Wang, Jie Wen, Yu Cheng, Changlin Liu, Chunxia Zhang, Changfeng Liu, Yongli Yan, Chengru Zhao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#16,291,311
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,844
of 7,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,585
of 353,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#81
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.