↓ Skip to main content

In vivo efficacy proof of concept of a large-size bioprinted dermo-epidermal substitute for permanent wound coverage

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vivo efficacy proof of concept of a large-size bioprinted dermo-epidermal substitute for permanent wound coverage
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2023
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1217655
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maxime Abellan Lopez, Laurence Hutter, Etienne Pagin, Mélanie Vélier, Julie Véran, Laurent Giraudo, Chloe Dumoulin, Laurent Arnaud, Nicolas Macagno, Romain Appay, Laurent Daniel, Benjamin Guillet, Laure Balasse, Hugo Caso, Dominique Casanova, Baptiste Bertrand, Françoise Dignat, Loïc Hermant, Hélène Riesterer, Fabien Guillemot, Florence Sabatier, Jérémy Magalon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#20,817,837
of 26,449,643 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,651
of 8,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,604
of 370,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#107
of 387 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,449,643 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,805 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 387 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.