You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rapid segmentation of computed tomography angiography images of the aortic valve: the efficacy and clinical value of a deep learning algorithm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1285166 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu Mao, Guangyu Zhu, Tingting Yang, Ruediger Lange, Timothée Noterdaeme, Chenming Ma, Jian Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#23,342,650
of 26,012,510 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#5,423
of 8,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,921
of 152,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,012,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.