↓ Skip to main content

Resorbable conductive materials for optimally interfacing medical devices with the living

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resorbable conductive materials for optimally interfacing medical devices with the living
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1294238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Sacchi, Fabien Sauter-Starace, Pascal Mailley, Isabelle Texier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#21,587,300
of 26,498,650 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#4,347
of 8,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,229
of 358,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#120
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,498,650 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,827 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.