↓ Skip to main content

In vitro evaluation of the osteogenic and antimicrobial potential of porous wollastonite scaffolds impregnated with ethanolic extracts of propolis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vitro evaluation of the osteogenic and antimicrobial potential of porous wollastonite scaffolds impregnated with ethanolic extracts of propolis
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1321466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Isabel Moreno Florez, Sarita Malagon, Sebastian Ocampo, Sara Leal-Marin, Edgar Alexander Ossa, Birgit Glasmacher, Claudia Garcia, Alejandro Pelaez-Vargas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#19,864,238
of 25,284,710 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,406
of 8,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,827
of 157,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#30
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,284,710 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.