The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rotation-traction manipulation induced intradiskal pressure changes in cervical spine—an in vitro study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1322212 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Changxiao Han, Minshan Feng, Haibao Wen, Xunlu Yin, Jing Li, Wuyin Du, Bochen Peng, Guangwei Liu, Liguo Zhu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#17,547,987
of 26,515,106 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,794
of 8,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,649
of 384,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#59
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,515,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,829 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.