The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bioprocess monitoring applications of an innovative ATR-FTIR spectroscopy platform
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1349473 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Loren Christie, Samantha Rutherford, David S. Palmer, Matthew J. Baker, Holly J. Butler |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 43% |
Student > Master | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 43% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,095,071
of 26,396,170 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#774
of 8,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,294
of 316,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,396,170 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,755 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.