The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
LLLT accelerates experimental wound healing under microgravity conditions via PI3K/AKT-CCR2 signal axis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1387474 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rongan Ye, Yu He, Wei Ni, Yiqiu Zhang, Ying Zhu, Muqing Cao, Ruida He, Min Yao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#3,898,193
of 26,562,579 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#558
of 8,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,532
of 193,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,562,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,834 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.