The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Marked differences between continuous long-term and clinical snapshot examinations: is the current standard of back pain diagnostics outdated?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1411958 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hendrik Schmidt, Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl, Maxim Bashkuev, Luis Alexander Becker, Matthias Pumberger, Georg N. Duda, Sandra Reitmaier |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#20,760,234
of 26,372,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,623
of 8,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,272
of 141,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#11
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,372,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,741 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.