↓ Skip to main content

Some remarks on the argument appealing to nature against synthetic biology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Some remarks on the argument appealing to nature against synthetic biology
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1428832
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruipeng Lei, Yifan Peng, Yutian He, Jun Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#16,741,639
of 26,370,058 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,412
of 8,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,995
of 139,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#5
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,736 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.