The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of repeated temperature cycling on cryopreserved human iPSC viability stems from cytochrome redox state changes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1443795 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jun Okuda, Namiko Watanabe, Tetsuji Nakamura, Kenta Mizushima, Heqi Xi, Yasuaki Kumamoto, Katsumasa Fujita, Masahiro Kino-Oka |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2024.
All research outputs
#18,039,961
of 26,399,279 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,260
of 8,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,234
of 137,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#9
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,399,279 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.