The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating the compressive strength of lightweight foamed concrete using different machine learning-based symbolic regression techniques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Built Environment, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbuil.2024.1446597 |
| Authors |
Kennedy C. Onyelowe, Ahmed M. Ebid, Danilo Fernando Fernandez Vinueza, Néstor Augusto Estrada Brito, Nancy Velasco, Jorge Buñay, Sabih Hashim Muhodir, Hamza Imran, Shadi Hanandeh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2024.
All research outputs
#20,906,287
of 26,561,175 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Built Environment
#471
of 1,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,785
of 147,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Built Environment
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,561,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,404 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.