↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of the impact of therapeutical biophilic design on health and wellbeing of patients and care providers in healthcare services settings

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Built Environment, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of the impact of therapeutical biophilic design on health and wellbeing of patients and care providers in healthcare services settings
Published in
Frontiers in Built Environment, September 2024
DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2024.1467692
Authors

Inas Al Khatib, Fatin Samara, Malick Ndiaye

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#21,638,979
of 26,567,854 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Built Environment
#679
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,110
of 131,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Built Environment
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,567,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.