You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gene regulatory networks and their applications: understanding biological and medical problems in terms of networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2014.00038 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frank Emmert-Streib, Matthias Dehmer, Benjamin Haibe-Kains |
| Abstract |
In recent years gene regulatory networks (GRNs) have attracted a lot of interest and many methods have been introduced for their statistical inference from gene expression data. However, despite their popularity, GRNs are widely misunderstood. For this reason, we provide in this paper a general discussion and perspective of gene regulatory networks. Specifically, we discuss their meaning, the consistency among different network inference methods, ensemble methods, the assessment of GRNs, the estimated number of existing GRNs and their usage in different application domains. Furthermore, we discuss open questions and necessary steps in order to utilize gene regulatory networks in a clinical context and for personalized medicine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 437 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 12% |
| Researcher | 51 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 13% |
| Unknown | 101 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 117 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 40 | 9% |
| Engineering | 20 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 58 | 13% |
| Unknown | 120 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,679,084
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#482
of 9,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,560
of 236,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.